Mental disorder councelor (Treanment for mental disorder (PTSD) Assignment

Mental disorder councelor (Treanment for mental disorder (PTSD) - Assignment Example He avoids traveling and meeting outsiders. His sleep patterns have become irregular and James is often was found sleeping during day-time. Sometimes he cries for no reason and appears emotionally disturbed. The concerned family members have brought him to the psychiatrist for evaluation and management. The problem James is suffering from is post traumatic stress disorder or PTSD. PTSD is defined as "a pathological anxiety that usually occurs after an individual experiences or witnesses severe trauma that constitutes a threat to the physical integrity or life of the individual or of another person" (Gore and Lucas, 2008). PTSD is the abnormal end result of a powerful and overwhelming stressful incident. It is a serious condition that can lead to personality changes, illness, and if it is ignored, may end with the person’s suicide. It occurs when people cannot work through their normal reactions and recover from the terrible experience. They get â€Å"stuck† and life for them is changed forever. There is high prevalence of PTSD and other psychiatric impairments in many emergency personnel. This is because of failure to cope with primary and particularly secondary stress in their daily work. This problem, together with the individual psychological consequences and expen ses related to work absenteeism and early retirement, seems to be very specific for these professions (Wagner, 1998). Symptoms of PTSD most often begin within three months of the event and last up to 6 months. Some may suffer even longer. The severity and duration of the illness varies from person to person. Symptoms of PTSD can be grouped into three main categories: Re-living, Avoiding and Increased arousal. Re-living: Personnel with PTSD repeatedly re-live the ordeal through thoughts and memories of the trauma through flashbacks, hallucinations and nightmares. They also may feel great distress when certain things remind them of the trauma. Avoiding: The personnel may

Incident of Morales video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Incident of Morales video - Essay Example However, the question remains: who is the one responsible for the death of Manuel Ortega? First issue questionable in the video was the hiring of the engineer Fred Martinez. He was a consultant of the competing company such that he is knowledgeable of confidential information about ChemiToil. Although it has been clarified that Fred did not sign any legal papers that restricts him from sharing secrets from ChemiToil, there is a difference between doing something illegal with doing something unethical. If Engineer Martinez revealed classified information to Phaust, he would have disobeyed the rule of practice stating that â€Å"Engineers shall not reveal facts, data, or information without the prior consent of the client or employer except as authorized or required by law or this Code (NSPE, 2007)† even if he is no longer en employee of ChemiToil. The fact, however, that Phaust has to formulate their own recipe for paint remover suggests that Fred did not disclose sensitive inf ormation from his former clients. It was also clarified that Fred designed the plant based on the preliminary documents from Chuck and Wally; not from the design of ChemiToil. These imply that the engineer did not do anything unethical regarding this issue of confidentiality. The next debatable issue came when 20 percent of the budget was cut off. The stress brought about by this event evidently caused the decisions that later lead to the death of their colleague. Fred did his job by clarifying to his bosses that there is a possibility for the project to be unsuccessful. However, it is also stated under the Code of Ethics that â€Å"If the client or employer insists on such unprofessional conduct, (the engineer) shall notify the proper authorities and withdraw from further service on the project (NSPE, 2007)†. Fred should not have let his boss Wally oppress him into following orders instead of making sure proper measures were implemented for the safety on the plant. The most alarming part of the whole video was when Wally talked to Fred about how everything is just about business and profit. He insisted that they should blindly follow orders from higher bosses. This part showed that the money restrictions were not only due to economic reasons but for personal gain. Wally risked the quality of the construction just to make sure that the employees get their bonuses. It was very subjective and selfish. Fred was also wrong to accept this reason. It is his responsibility to put the safety of everyone before personal gain. He should have reasoned out with Wally about this. They should not have kept this reason from the others. Everybody else was under the impression that there was no other choice except to cut expenses. It was one of the key scenes when the Mexican Official asked Fred what he thinks if the point in which the mistake was made. It made the audience start to wonder and be aware of the turn of events. It was when the Mexican official asked if eco nomic issues dominated the decision making of the project that Fred made a very unethical gesture. In this part, Fred denied being influenced by economic factors. It has been clear all through out the story that the restrictions were due to finances. It was clear that the characters understood perfectly the risks they are taking just because of money constraints. It is very much established in the Code of Ethics that engineers should be guided by the highest standards